Newly constituted Rogers board deemed legitimate

By CityNews Staff

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has made a key ruling in the battle over control of the board of Rogers Communications.

Justice Shelley Fitzpatrick has ruled in favour of Edward Rogers, the son of the late Ted Rogers, who has been battling with his mother and two of his sisters for control of the company.

Edward Rogers was removed as chair after he attempted to remove Joe Natale from his role as CEO. He then named new directors to the company without a vote of the board.

Justice Fitzpatrick ruled it was Rogers’ right, as chair of the family trust to remove and replace the five directors.

A lawyer representing Rogers’ mother and two sisters had argued the independent decision went against the company’s governance practices and the wishes of the late Ted Rogers.

Fitzpatrick did not share reasons for siding with Edward Rogers.

In court filings, Edward Rogers claimed his family members were on board with a plan to remove current Joe Natale from his position as CEO. He said his family, along with the board approved Natale’s retirement, only to backpedal on the plans a couple of days later.

Lawyers representing Edward Rogers’ mother Loretta Rogers and sisters Martha Rogers and Melinda Rogers-Hixon requested a stay of proceedings until an appeal may be heard. The judge rejected that request, stating it’s not necessary because there is no sign there will be an immediate change in Rogers leadership.

The company moved ahead with plans to acquire Shaw Communications Inc. in the spring. The $26 billion deal is still awaiting regulatory approvals.

Justice Fitzpatrick said her decision was effective immediately.

Rogers Communications is incorporated in British Columbia — the reason for the court fight beginning in that province.

Rogers is the parent company of this website and radio station

Top Stories

Top Stories

Most Watched Today